What is the Skyscraper Curse and how is it related to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory? |
The Skyscraper Curse is an economic phenomenon where the construction of extremely tall buildings precedes an economic recession or financial crisis. It is related to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory because the artificially low interest rates during the boom phase encourage malinvestment, leading to a bust. The construction of skyscrapers is often a result of this malinvestment. |
How can the Skyscraper Curse be used to predict a recession or financial crisis? |
The Skyscraper Curse can be used to predict a recession or financial crisis by observing the construction of new skyscrapers. When many tall buildings are being built or planned, it is a sign of increased investment and economic optimism. However, if this construction is not based on sound economic principles and is driven by artificially low interest rates, it will eventually lead to a bust. |
Who coined the term Skyscraper Curse ? |
Mark Thornton, an economist from the Mises Institute, coined the term Skyscraper Curse in 2005. |
What are some historical examples of the Skyscraper Curse? |
Some historical examples of the Skyscraper Curse include the Empire State Building in the 1930s, the World Trade Center in the 1970s, and the Burj Khalifa in the 2000s. Each of these was constructed during a period of economic optimism and preceded a recession or financial crisis. |
What is malinvestment and how is it related to the Skyscraper Curse? |
Malinvestment is a misallocation of resources due to artificially low interest rates, which leads to investments in projects that are not economically viable. The construction of skyscrapers is often a result of this malinvestment, as developers take advantage of the easy credit and low interest rates to fund large and expensive projects that may not be profitable in the long run. |
How does the Austrian Business Cycle Theory explain the Skyscraper Curse? |
The Austrian Business Cycle Theory explains the Skyscraper Curse by pointing to the artificially low interest rates during the boom phase of the economy. These low interest rates encourage investment in projects that are not economically viable, leading to malinvestment. The construction of skyscrapers is often a result of this malinvestment, as developers take advantage of the easy credit and low interest rates to fund large and expensive projects that may not be profitable in the long run. Eventually, this malinvestment leads to a bust phase in the economy, where resources must be reallocated from unproductive investments to more profitable ventures. |
Can the Skyscraper Curse be seen as a form of confirmation bias? |
Yes, the Skyscraper Curse can be seen as a form of confirmation bias, as it is easy to view the construction of tall buildings as a predictor of economic downturns when looking only at a small sample of cases where this was true. However, it is important to note that the Skyscraper Curse is not a foolproof predictor of economic crises, and there have been many cases where the construction of tall buildings did not precede a recession or financial crisis. |
What is the alternative to artificially low interest rates proposed by Austrian economists to avoid the Skyscraper Curse? |
Austrian economists propose that the best way to avoid the Skyscraper Curse is to allow interest rates to be set by the market, without interference from central banks or government. In a free market system, interest rates will be set based on the supply and demand for credit, and will accurately reflect the state of the economy. This will avoid the malinvestment and misallocation of resources that leads to the Skyscraper Curse. |
How have some governments attempted to use the construction of skyscrapers as an economic stimulus? |
Some governments have attempted to use the construction of skyscrapers as an economic stimulus by providing subsidies or tax breaks to developers, or by funding the construction of public buildings such as city halls or sports stadiums. However, this can lead to malinvestment and a misallocation of resources, as the construction of these buildings may not be economically viable in the long run. In addition, these policies can contribute to the Skyscraper Curse by encouraging the construction of tall buildings that are not needed or profitable. |
What are some potential criticisms of the Skyscraper Curse theory? |
Some potential criticisms of the Skyscraper Curse theory include the fact that it is not a foolproof predictor of economic crises, and that there have been many cases where the construction of tall buildings did not precede a recession or financial crisis. In addition, some economists argue that the construction of tall buildings is not necessarily a symptom of malinvestment, but can be a sign of economic growth and development. Finally, some critics argue that Austrian economics is too focused on individual actors and does not take into account the systemic factors that can contribute to economic cycles. |